At a time when public debate is increasingly polarized and superficial, Hungarian Conservative remains committed to depth and independent thought.
Donate Now
Please consider supporting our mission.
To provide the best experiences, we and our partners use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us and our partners to process personal data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site and show (non-) personalized ads. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
Click below to consent to the above or make granular choices. Your choices will be applied to this site only. You can change your settings at any time, including withdrawing your consent, by using the toggles on the Cookie Policy, or by clicking on the manage consent button at the bottom of the screen.
‘The Best Defence of MCC is the Intellectual Content Created There’ — An Open Letter to the Editorial Board of The Guardian
‘The Best Defence of MCC is the Intellectual Content Created There’ — An Open Letter to the Editorial Board of The Guardian
Graduates of the postgraduate programmes of MCC taking a selfie at the graduation ceremony in Budapest on 28 May 2022.
Szilárd Koszticsák/MTI
Michael O’Shea, a Danube Institute visiting fellow, alumnus of the Budapest Fellowship Program, sponsored by the Hungary Foundation and the Mathias Corvinus Collegium (MCC), submitted a rebuttal to The Guardian after it published former Budapest Fellow Bence X Szechenyi’s defamatory column about MCC earlier this month.
Since he received no reply, Hungarian Conservative is now sharing the comments in their entirety. (We have already published a response to the Bence Szechenyi op-ed by senior fellow at the Center for Fundamental Rights (Alapjogokért Központ) Kelli Buzzard, a former researcher at the Department of Social Sciences and History at Mathias Corvinus Collegium, which you can read here.) We, however, agree with Mr Michael O’Shea that ‘Of course, the best defence of MCC is the intellectual content created by its scholars, researchers, and students. I direct any interested parties, first and foremost, in that direction.’
I completed the same fellowship this author [Bence X Szechenyi] describes in this article. Like virtually everyone who has been affiliated with MCC in any way, I consider it delusional.
During my time there, MCC opened its doors to reporters from outlets like The New York Times and Vice News, which were obviously going to produce hostile content. This author wrote a couple of pieces [during his fellowship] praising himself; the idea that anyone would take the trouble to stifle him is laughable.
Panic attacks are keeping him up at night? My colleagues, friends, and I can’t take that assertion seriously. If he experienced any such thing, it was probably a result of publicly insulting his fellowship colleagues with whom he spent ten months in close company. That he stooped to such a tactic in this article says everything about his perspective and character.
If you’re inclined to dislike Hungary, you can find intelligent analysis supporting your view. This isn’t it.
At a time when public debate is increasingly polarized and superficial, Hungarian Conservative remains committed to depth, intellectual honesty, and independent conservative thought.
Producing high-quality journalism requires resources. Your contribution helps us expand our coverage, reach new audiences, and keep our content accessible.
Please consider supporting our mission.
The Brussels Blacklist: How the EU’s Gatekeepers Silence Dissent
MCC Says Foundation Restructuring Follows Legal Timetable, Rejects Claims of Political Retaliation
MCC Brussels Denies Any Corruption on Its Part in Registry Suspension
READ NEXT
The Arctic and Strategic Uncertainty: The Anti-NATO Playbook
How China Is Reshaping Global Power Amid the U.S.–Israeli War
Ceuta and the Europe We Pass On — Where Inherited Burden Meets Duty to Posterity
CITATION